Musings on Obedience
I have no wish to be a ‘burr under anyone’s saddle blanket’ concerning the legitimacy of disobedience to the Vatican when you think their rules and regulations are wrong. Let us examine another view in critiquing actions of others within the context of obedience to legitimate authority. Manyemphasize the word ‘love’. Even though God created mankind out of love, the word ‘love’ does not appear in God’s commandment to Adam, or His “Ten Commandments” to Moses” or the “Our Father”, the Prayer that Jesus gave us. What it does contain are God the Father’s rules and regulations regarding our moral conduct. In the “Our Father” we are asked to “hallow His name”, “do His will on earth”, “forgive those who trespass against us”, to avoid temptation and evil.
Obedience is our basic responsibility because God created each one with a free will and in His image and likeness, to know, love and serve Him here so that we can be with Him eternally when we die. Thus, we are children of God and heirs to His kingdom. With our free will we can choose to disobey God and incur a penalty. “Serving” Him requires obedience. At death those sins of ours, not yet forgiven and atoned for when we die, will be judged by the God of Justice. We would suffer punishment for our sins either in Hell eternally or in Purgatory temporarily; unless Jesus Christ exercises His Divine Mercy.
God’s Divine love brought about the creation of Adam, then Eve, the promise of a God-man to redeem us, the issuing of Commandments, Prayers. Jesus repeated the Commandments, taught us the “Our Father”, commanded we do spiritual and corporal works of mercy and wrapped these “commandments” within His “Divine Commandment of Love”.Jesus was commanded by God the Father to be Our Redeemer for the crime of Adam which required much pain and suffering to atone for that crime, original sin. All sin has consequences, be it reparation, atonement, punishment; and someone has to do it, unless Divine Mercy “wipes the slate clean”.
In the Garden of Olives Jesus, the God-man, knowing the pain and suffering He was to endure, asked His Father to relieve Him of His Redemptive mission; but Jesus agreed to obey His Father with the words “… not My will but Your will be done!” This is the essence of “obedience”. Jesus had grievances against Herod who slew all boys around His age of 2 ~ no playmates. If, during His public life in the Jerusalem area when preaching to the crowds, He asked all men, born in the area to rise, and then asked those older than 33 or younger than 30 to sit down, who beside Himself would be standing? Who killed His cousin John? How many members of the House of David were killed by Romans, etc.? I think these are legitimate grievances. Did He rant and rave against these murderers?
When He was on the Cross, did He deliver a polemic against the Jewish religious and civil leaders? Did He rant to Caesar to eliminate the death penalty? If He did, neither the gospel writers nor others wrote about it.What did He do? He became subject to His parents after being “AWOL” in the temple. To the centurion, He praised him for being a good and obedient boss who demanded obedience from his subjects and was good to them. To the people He said “render to Caesar the things that are Caesar’s, to God the things that are God’s”. Jesus thought Caesar had legitimacy as a ruler and subjects had an obligation to obey. He did not castigate Herod or Pilate. On the cross He asked God the Father to forgive His tormentors. When asked for mercy from a condemned thief, He granted that thief Divine Mercy.
Evidently His Father’s promise to Adam, the first disobedient person, to redeem mankind for Adam’s crime had priority. Jesus focused on doing what He was obligated to do. St. Faustina1, Jesus’ Secretary and canonized by Pope John Paul II in 2000, promised Jesus that she would do His will. When her confessor, superior or Bishop thwarted her efforts, she would get angry or ‘wrapped around the axle’. She ‘ranted’ to Jesus about her inability to do what Jesus ordered. He lectured her to be always obedient to her superiors, her Confessor and her Superior. If she had a legitimate gripe she was to obey then complain to Him, so that He can decide how else to accomplish His plan. He reminding Her that her suffering was like a drop in the ocean compared to what He suffered for her on the Cross.
He encouraged her to continue doing His will through her Confessor. On Nov. 11, 1924, in St. Faustina’s Diary, para. 0534, Jesus said: “I have come to do My Father’s will. I obeyed My parents, I obeyed My tormentors and now I obey the priests.” In Mar.1936, [para. 0639], Jesus said: “My daughter, I desire that even in the smallest things, you rely on your confessor. Your greatest sacrifices do not please Me if you practice them without the confessor’s permission; on the other hand, the smallest sacrifice finds great value in My eyes, … On Jan. 22, 1937 in St. Faustina’s Diary, [para. 0894], Jesus said: “My daughter, know that you give Me greater glory by a single act of obedience than by longer prayers and mortifications.”
King Henry VIII had serious grievances against the Vatican regarding refusal of annulment of his marriage and many other requests. Though he got the proverbial bureaucratic treatment in most of his dealings with the Vatican, King Henry VIII, under his mantra of the “divine right of kings”, (like Caesar), chose to disobey the Pope, Vicar of Jesus, in the area of moral rules and regulation. In fact he appointed himself and his heirs “vicar” and formed the Church of England [C.O.E.]. Roman Catholics were coerced into exchanging their obedience to the Pope to obedience to Henry to become English Catholics. Henry VIII’s disobedience has its terrible evil consequences, still continuing to this day. Those, that refused, faced martyrdom, imprisonment, confiscation of property, and more. The obligation for obedience to Henry, who usurped the “faith and morals” authority of the Pope, is really binding on no one; but out of human concern for themselves, their families, and their status thousands obeyed Henry VIII and deserted Christ’s Vicar. These people were led by clerical authorities who had also deserted Christ and His church.
Many people assumed that the priesthood of these clerics required their obedience even though they separated themselves from the dynamic role of Jesus in their daily life through Confession and Communion. The disobedience of members of the C. O. E. continues; but many clerics and parishes with many members are returning to papal obedience.Martin Luther, a Prince of the Church, having taken a vow of obedience to God and the Pope, had, what he thought was legitimate grievances against the Pope and his staff. His civil ruling hierarchy also had grievances against the Pope, and they inveighed upon Martin Luther to do something about it. If he went up the chain of command to his “Confessor”, the Pope, requesting satisfaction, he received none. Martin Luther’s response is to be a “whistle-blower”. He ranted and raved in public against the Pope and his staff, which agitated the public who were put in a position to take sides, creating a rift. Breaking his vow of obedience to Christ and His Vicar was his answer. Unfortunately many members of his flock followed this bad shepherd.
Obedience to God through the Pope, Christ’s Vicar, was forbidden. He was going to do things his way. He was going to create his own command structure, the Lutheran Church, with himself as their “vicar” backed by civil authority. He tried to placate some of his flock, by saying that whenever he decided that Rome had repented and reformed he would subordinate himself and them to the Pope, the Vicar of Christ. [If you don’t play ball my way, I’ll pick up my marbles and go home”!] He wasn’t going to do things God’s way. There was no humbling of self to continue performing in accordance to God’s will.
The above historical events show the horrendous results of direct disobedience to moral authority on others. In a synopsis of the book “Jesus of Nazareth”, which was written by Pope Benedict XVI, the following excerpt applies: To save humanity “He must recapitulate the whole of history from its beginnings” (Page 26), he must conquer the principal temptations that, in various forms, threaten men in all ages and, transforming them into obedience, reopen the road toward God (Chapter 2), toward the true Promised Land, which is the “Kingdom of God” (Page 44). , ROME, APRIL 15, 2007 (Zenit.org)
Obedience to the will of God within ourselves begins after birth, first to our parents and onward through life to people and organizations due our obedience. Some of us took Baptismal vows, Confirmation vows, reconciliation vows, Nuptial vows and Priestly vows. Some also take vows of obedience to their country, “Caesar”, and to various organizations. Not many of us “grin and bear it’ when we don’t want to obey. Most of us do our own ranting and raving at authority. Many times our reasons are legitimate. In families, schools and other groups, as children, we are called “tattle tales”. In business and government we are called “whistle blowers”, sometimes “traitor” is used. Whatever the case we most always receive punishment in some form. As adults, penalties including firing, blackballing, jail, damage suits are awaiting us. We are often conflicted with choices that would violate God’s will. For us to resolve moral conflicts, whether under King Henry VIII, Martin Luther, our parents or other legitimate authorities, we have to choose obedience to God’s will or theirs.
At conception God gave us a moral conscience to discern between good and evil, which gives us feedback of shame, [when choosing evil] or honor, [when choosing good].Can our personal disobedience to moral authority have terrible effects on others? Disobedience to parents can badly influence other siblings. If not corrected your disobedience likely will continue with school and civil authorities which spreads this ‘disease’ to others – and on it goes. A horrendous example is when one uses drugs, then influences others to use drugs, then sells drugs to purchase more drugs. Thus our drug culture has enslaved millions of people since the mid 1900’s, and resulted in millions of other crimes including theft, human assaults, and deaths.Moral disobedience, whether by parents, clergy or religious to God or Vatican, influence children to do the same. This has a cascading effect. Today, less than 40% participation in Christian worship services, less than 10% in seeking direct reconciliation with God through clergy for forgiveness of their personal sins. In effect God has been exiled from our lives even though many still go through the religious motions for social and other reasons.
Obedience to God’s will is our life’s work. True success will be recognized through our corporal and spiritual works of mercy. These emphasize our love of God, ourself and our neighbor. This in turn has a cascading effect on others who are influenced to obey God’s will and do good works. The mantra, “know, love and serve God” acts like an eternal reciprocating engine propelling us to God’s kingdom through obedience. 1At 14, after 3 yrs. of elementary education, St. Faustina became an indentured servant in a private home. Despite pleas from family and friends, she entered convent life at the urging of God. God appeared to her and asked her to be His secretary and record His messages. She started a diary which has illuminated for people, throughout the world, the essence of God. The major impact was the establishment of The Feast of Divine Mercy [annually celebrated on the first Sunday after Easter] for the provision by God’s mercy, forgiveness, remission of punishment for all those who seek salvation; and who reconciled themselves and said The Chaplet that God dictated to St. Faustina [canonized by Pope John Paul II – 4/30/2000]. [‘Diary of Saint Maria Faustina Kowalska exists in English. The latest English version was publish in 2004 by The National Shrine of Divine Mercy, Eden Hill, Stockbridge, MA]
Submitted by Paul D Kearns
Responses to: cispkearns@aol.com
May 4, 2007 © ~ rev. 1 01/28/08; rev. 2 09/09/08